What is a Source-to-Sink System?


A source-to-sink analysis is a method in sedimentary geology that integrates the studies of an entire sedimentary system from its upstream source in the continental area to the ultimate depositional sink, most commonly on deep basins, in a process that can take from thousands to millions of years to be completed.


 Source-to-sink system schematic (modified from Martinsen et al., 2010).

There are three main elements in the source-to-sink system, source, transfer zone, and sink. 


    1) Source

Source area in the source-to-sink system is in the continental realm where the main erosional processes occur. The erosion process in the source area is mainly driven by slow processes which can take millions of years: tectonics and climate. Tectonics generates high relief structures like mountains while climatic factors like precipitation bring water down the mountains. Hence, more sediment supply can be provided from the source area. 

During the erosion processes, a rock will be broken down into smaller disintegrated particles so that they can be transported by water, air or ice as the transport agents.

There are two types of erosional processes:

  1. Physical (mechanical) erosion – the disintegration of rock into smaller fragments without changing the chemical composition. It occurs mainly by temperature and pressure changes.
  2. Chemical erosion – the disintegration of a rock accompanied by changes in its chemical compositions done by interactions between chemicals in water or air and in the rock itself. 

Himalayan mountain as a source of sediments and Indus River in Ladakh, India (from Britannica).

 


Stone Forest in the Yunnan Province, China. This landscape was shaped by the chemical weathering of limestone and dolomite, called karstification (personal file, Rocío Jaimes).

2) Transfer Zone

The transfer zone is the connection between the source and the sink. It is the place where all the sediment produced upstream (source) will be transported to its final destination (sink), like a conveyor belt. This conveyor belt is called the main channel or the trunk channel, where the other smaller rivers and brooks converge. Relief in this zone is not as high as in the source and the hillslopes are generally smoother. Both erosion and deposition can happen in this zone, but on a smaller scale than in the source and sink areas. Consequently, interesting structures called river terraces might be formed in this area.

The transfer zone links the source to the sink area. Transport of sediments through fluvial channels is the main process of this area, yet sediments can also be temporarily stored in fluvial terraces (modified from Worldatlas).



    3) Source

The sink is the ultimate destination for the sediments in this system. Hence, the main process is deposition. The sink can be an oceanic basin or a large lake. The type of deposits depends on the water energy. Sediments with coarser grain sizes like sand will be deposited close to the river mouths and those with smaller grain sizes like silt or clay in the calmer, deeper areas such as the deep sea. Storms mainly rework shallow areas e.g. on the continental shelf. In the long term, sedimentation depends on the sea level, e.g., pauses in deposition can occur in the center of the sink during the sea-level rise or a decrease of sediment supply from the rivers. On the other hand, the sediments in shallow areas will be eroded and transported into the deeper sink during sea-level fall.



 Amazon Delta as an example of a sink area (bathymetric data from BODC, 2020).

As younger sediments are always deposited on top of older ones, we can investigate the changes over time. But we need to carefully select the position in the basin for sampling as it will affect our investigation.

 

WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO STUDY SOURCE-TO-SINK SYSTEMS?

As a researcher, after we understand what a source-to-sink system is, we have to dig deeper into the goal of these studies: why do we do it? 

There are 2 main goals in this case: (1) to fulfill our thirst for knowledge, and (2) to benefit our society.

Describing a sediment routing system, how it works and understanding why it happens the way it does and which parameters control it, helps us predict the location of certain types of sediments and resources, and better make use of our surroundings without degrading the environment. 

 

WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS?

The 2004 Margins Program from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) states that ‘’Erosion sculpts the landscape, and distribution of the sediment creates the alluvial plains, coasts, deltas, and continental shelves upon which most of the world’s population lives and derives much of its energy and water’’. Such sediment transfer from source-to-sink plays an important role in: 

·       The cycles of elements (such as carbon, silica, etc.);

·       Ecosystem changes due to climate change and sea-level rise;

·       How we manage our natural resources, such as soils, wetlands, groundwater, and hydrocarbons (Martinsen et al. 2010).

Nile delta and major cities - about 39 million people live within the delta region (from Wikipedia).


One of the biggest challenges in hydrocarbon exploration is: how do we select the best location to be explored? This is directly linked to the understanding of the three essential parts of a petroleum system: source rock, seal, and reservoir rock, which are mainly sedimentary rocks. Therefore, it’s necessary to have the best analysis of geological data from the complete sedimentary system (source-to-sink). The same idea can be used for the exploration of other resources, such as water, metals, sand, clay and aggregates which are often hosted by sedimentary rocks. By understanding how the deposits are formed, we will have better predictions to determine where we can find and explore them for the development of our society. 

Another important part of understanding source-to-sink systems is to support the assessment of risks related to them, such as mass movements, heavy metals and other polluting substances.

Integrating knowledge from the source area to its ultimate depositional sink is an advanced and the needed approach to better understand the whole sedimentary systems nowadays rather than putting them into separate individual aspects. This approach will both nurture our science and society towards a more sustainable future. 

 

If you have any questions about source-to-sink, please leave a comment below! Thank you for reading and see you next month for the next post!




References:

Martinsen, O., Sømme, T. O.,Thurmond, J. B., Helland-Hansen, W.,, Lunt, I.(2010). Source-to-sink systems on passive margins: Theory and practice with an example from the Norwegian continental margin. Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series. 7. 913-920. DOI: 10.1144/0070913.

 




Location: Rennes, France

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is a “Slow” Process in a Source-to-Sink System?

Image
The timescale of geological processes is very extensive. “Fast” processes like earthquakes, storms, or tides last from a couple of minutes to weeks. “Slow” processes, like orogenic uplifts or continent break-ups on the contrary can take up to millions of years (Fig. 1). In this post we will look into these slow processes in the context of the source-to-sink approach, introducing some concepts that provide a useful framework to understand the dynamics of these long processes in sedimentary systems. Figure 1. Temporal scale showing the differences in terms of duration of several geological processes as well as the common tools used to measure them. Bear in mind that the scale is logarithmic. Modified from Romans et al ., 2016. To understand slow geological processes in the context of source-to-sink analysis, we first have to understand the concept of steady-state topography. There are two major processes that drive topography inside a catchment (Fig. 2), one that creates positive rel
Read more

Methods to Investigate Source-to-Sink Systems

Image
ESRs in the field and in the lab. The sample processing starts by describing, counting, measuring, sampling, and investigating in the field. Samples are then taken to the laboratory for analytical work. Keep up with future posts to see the field and laboratory results! Much like building a complex puzzle, multiple components come together to foster an understanding of the evolution of S2S systems at various temporal and spatial scales. Some of these components are (1) understanding the major processes and fluvial dynamics acting on the system, (2) recognizing the changes or signals in the sedimentary record, (3) deciphering the environment necessary to produce a given signal within the record, and (4) contemplating other dynamics that would change the expression of an environmental event in the final rock/sediment record. Thus, studying S2S systems often requires an integration of research methods and the collaboration of specialists across different fields.     Pieces of the puzzle;
Read more